
The USDA has ordered the Nation's Largest Beef Recall. Based on what I'm reading and hearing don't be surprised if the Fed's don't bring additional criminal charges against the company Westland/Hallmark. If they don't, they're not doing there job. People should be outraged. Is it not outrageous that food not fit for human consumption is being fed to our children at school? What group of money focused idiots thought this would be a good idea and would go unnoticed? It also clearly calls into question what our government is doing about inspection. Obviously the inspection program at the USDA is soundly asleep at the wheel while our kids are eating beef from sick "downer" cattle. Yet another reason to write your member of congress and tell them to stop hearings that are a waste of time (see blog on Clemens below) and do something for our nations food supply.
Here's the story:
AP Greg Risling
Posted: 2008-02-17 22:31:57
LOS ANGELES (Feb. 17) - The U.S. Department of Agriculture on Sunday ordered the recall of 143 million pounds of frozen beef from a California slaughterhouse, the subject of an animal-abuse investigation, that provided meat to school lunch programs.
In what officials said was the largest beef recall in U.S. history, the Department of Agriculture on Sunday ordered the recall of 143 million pounds of frozen beef from a California slaughterhouse that provided meat to school lunch programs. The recall will affect beef products that came from the Westland/Hallmark Meat Co.
Officials said it was the largest beef recall in the United States, surpassing a 1999 ban of 35 million pounds of ready-to-eat meats. No illnesses have been linked to the newly recalled meat, and officials said the health threat was likely small.
The recall will affect beef products dating to Feb. 1, 2006, that came from Chino-based Westland/Hallmark Meat Co., the federal agency said.
Secretary of Agriculture Ed Schafer said his department has evidence that Westland did not routinely contact its veterinarian when cattle became non-ambulatory after passing inspection, violating health regulations.
"Because the cattle did not receive complete and proper inspection, Food Safety and Inspection Service has determined them to be unfit for human food and the company is conducting a recall," Schafer said in a statement.
A phone message left for Westland president Steve Mendell was not immediately returned.
Federal officials suspended operations at Westland/Hallmark after an undercover Humane Society video surfaced showing crippled and sick animals being shoved with forklifts.
Two former employees were charged Friday. Five felony counts of animal cruelty and three misdemeanors were filed against a pen manager. Three misdemeanor counts — illegal movement of a non-ambulatory animal — were filed against an employee who worked under that manager. Both were fired.
Authorities said the video showed workers kicking, shocking and otherwise abusing "downer" animals that were apparently too sick or injured to walk into the slaughterhouse. Some animals had water forced down their throats, San Bernardino County prosecutor Michael Ramos said.
No charges have been filed against Westland, but an investigation by federal authorities continues.
Officials estimate that about 37 million pounds of the recalled beef went to school programs, but they believe most of the meat probably has already been eaten.
"We don't know how much product is out there right now. We don't think there is a health hazard, but we do have to take this action," said Dr. Dick Raymond, USDA Undersecretary for Food Safety.
Most of the beef was sent to distribution centers in bulk packages. The USDA said it will work with distributors to determine how much meat remains.
Federal regulations call for keeping downed cattle out of the food supply because they may pose a higher risk of contamination from E. coli, salmonella or mad cow disease because they typically wallow in feces and their immune systems are often weak.
About 150 school districts around the nation have stopped using ground beef from Hallmark Meat Packing Co., which is associated with Westland. Two fast-food chains, Jack-In-the-Box and In-N-Out, said they would not use beef from Westland/Hallmark.
Jack in the Box, a San Diego-based company with restaurants in 18 states, told its meat suppliers not to use Hallmark until further notice, but it was unclear whether it had used any Hallmark meat. In-N-Out, an Irvine-based chain, also halted use of the Westland/Hallmark beef. Other chains such as McDonald's and Burger King said they do not buy beef from Westland.
Raymond countered a claim leveled by Humane Society President and CEO Wayne Pacelle, who said a USDA inspector was at the Westland plant for about two hours each day. USDA inspectors are there at slaughterhouses "continuously," Raymond said.
Federal lawmakers on Thursday had called for the Government Accountability Office to investigate the safety of meat in the National School Lunch Program.
Upon learning about the recall, some legislators criticized the USDA, saying the federal agency should conduct more thorough inspections to ensure tainted beef doesn't get to the public.
"Today marks the largest beef recall in U.S. history, and it involves the national school lunch program and other federal food and nutrition programs," said U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin, chairman of the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry. "This begs the question: how much longer will we continue to test our luck with weak enforcement of federal food safety regulations?"
Advocacy groups also weighed in, noting the problems at Westland wouldn't have been revealed had it not been for animal right activists.
"On the one hand, I'm glad that the recall is taking place. On the other, it's somewhat disturbing, given that obviously much of this food has already been eaten," said Jean Halloran, director of food policy initiatives at Consumers Union. "It's really closing the barn door after the cows left."
Associated Press writer Jacob Adelman contributed to this report.
1 comment:
It amazes me how much power and trust we give to persons and entities that do not have our best interests in mind. From politics to pharmaceuticals, from the food industry to corporate America... it seems trust is an inherent part of what our society is learning at this time. How it has eben abused, how it hs been too freely given... How do we live good lives, while simultaneously creating a connected, present society that supports growth and development of all? I truly believe we are only as strong as our weakest link. It is our responsibility to wake up to the need snad demands of our society; when we don't, we are awakened by threats of bad beef and abuse to animals, by Enron fiascos and debilitating wars that cost more than we can afford... and I digress. Which leads me to your more recent blurb about plagiarism. In terms of the Obama/Clinto politics of today, I find it amazing that Hillary is choosing to put her energy into such a petty concern, when she is taking checks from some of the biggest lobbyists out there. I dont want to trust a conadidate that will take nearly a million dollars from the pharmaceutical companies. How, with trust in mind, do you think she would pay them back in office? With our best interests in mind or hers? The power of money can be a slippery slope when it is not balanced with the responsibility of the well being of all.
Post a Comment